What should be done to prepare us for a world where anyone can take any footage from anywhere, and run it against massive databases to identify everyone? What does that mean for your social media profile, for attending a televised sporting event, and for being in a society where technology is everywhere, and everyone is carrying – or wearing – a camera?

Privacy as we know it may look very different in the future and the Institute will closely engage in discussions on this issue.

This chapter of the State of Biometrics Report considers the benefits and risks of biometrics in the private sector.

To read the full report, become a member. Details on membership benefits and how to apply can be found here.

COVID-19 recovery | Digital identity | Governance | Future directions | In the news

The post State of Biometrics Report 2021: Commercial use of biometrics appeared first on Biometrics Institute.

2015 Survey Summary

2015 Full Report

The post 2015 BIOMETRICS INSTITUTE INDUSTRY SURVEY REPORT appeared first on Biometrics Institute.

According to Human Rights Watch (HRW), Chinese authorities in Xinjiang collected biometric data of all of its citizens between the ages of 12 and 65 years living in the region in 2017 (read the article). DNA samples, fingerprints, iris scans and blood types were taken through a free medical examination programme, ‘Physicals for All’. It is reported that 19 million of the total population of 21 million have been sampled.

There seems to be some confusion over whether the samples were taken voluntarily; one resident felt he had no choice but to allow the tests as he did not wish to be seen as a person of concern, possibly even a ‘political dissident’. Reports suggest that officials were told to convince residents to give their consent and apply pressure if necessary.

Press articles claimed that participants had been diagnosed with illnesses they would not have known about had they not allowed the samples to be taken. However, one resident claims that he wasn’t even told the results of his tests. In addition, participants have apparently not been made aware of how their personal data will be used or told how long it will be kept for. Going forward, it seems that personal data will be collected from anyone in the region wanting a passport or to access public services such as enrolling in schools.

There is also a suggestion that biometric data could be used for surveillance of people of interest; Xinjiang is home to a vast proportion of Uyghurs and other Muslim ethnic minorities who have allegedly already had their freedoms restricted by the government.

If these claims made by Human Rights Watch are true, it could be seen as a gross violation of human rights. However, obtaining biometric data at all is not necessarily the problem, the key issue here is the difference between responsible use and abuse:

• Has someone obtained the data rightfully or have they simply bent the rules to suit a different agenda?
• For what specific and limited purpose were the vast array of biometrics taken?
• Were individuals informed of the purpose and assured that the information gleaned from them would not be used for anything other than the stated purpose? 
• Are the biometrics stored? When, where, why and for how long? 
• Did individuals explicitly consent to onward/future use for unspecified purposes?
• Were all the biometrics necessary for the purpose they were told they would be used for?

The critical issue is ‘informed consent’ and a clear ‘message about the purposes to which the collected biometric will be put’. If it is for stated health purposes, then that should be it. To then use it for social rewards or privileges or to identify critics of a regime or organisation would be a significant change of purpose which the Biometrics Institute does not support in its Privacy Guidelines.

I will borrow a metaphor from a colleague who articulated this much better: The car has been a great progress for all of us. Some people will never respect a stop sign or a red light. This is very bad. It does not mean that the rules on the road and driving cars are bad.

The Biometrics Institute’s mission is to promote the responsible use of biometrics and one important tool we have developed is our Privacy Guidelines with key recommendations on biometrics and privacy. This Guidelines are available to our members here and we will continue the discussion on this issue at the US Conference (20-21 March 2018) where HRW is planning to join us.

The post THE IMPORTANCE OF INFORMED CONSENT AND PURPOSE: HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH – AUTHORITIES COLLECTING BIOMETRIC DATA IN XINJIANG appeared first on Biometrics Institute.

Biometrics Institute Industry Tracker 2017

The post Biometrics Institute Industry Survey 2017 appeared first on Biometrics Institute.

Consumer Devices Drive Public Acceptance of Biometrics

The post CONSUMER DEVICES DRIVE PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF BIOMETRIC appeared first on Biometrics Institute.

Biometrics Institute Industry Survey 2016

The post BIOMETRICS INSTITUTE INDUSTRY SURVEY RESULTS 2016 appeared first on Biometrics Institute.

Compiled by our Security and Integrity Expert Group, it was designed to demystify some of the regular headlines around biometric spoofing. More importantly it serves as a discussion paper for Biometrics Institute members and stakeholders to raise awareness about the importance of vulnerability assessments and the new standards and techniques available to mitigate risk.

Please note: This document is strictly for Biometrics Institute member use only. Reproduction is limited to a single hard copy for internal use. Electronic access is restricted to one system at a time, and the document must not be transferred, shared, or uploaded to any network, either internally or externally.

The post Top 10 Vulnerability Questions appeared first on Biometrics Institute.

Biometrics Institute Industry Survey 2015

The post BIOMETRICS INSTITUTE INDUSTRY SURVEY RESULTS 2015 appeared first on Biometrics Institute.

Barclays Bank Article

The post BARCLAYS STREAMLINES PHONE BANKING WITH VOICE BIOMETRICS appeared first on Biometrics Institute.

The post BIOMETRICS LIFTOUT | THE RACONTEUR appeared first on Biometrics Institute.